Who Is Responsible For Creating These Violent Young Men Essays

Who Is Responsible For Creating These Violent Young Men? Who is Responsible for Creating Violent Young Men? When will the violence end? Who is to blame? Only so much fault can be placed on parents or circumstances alone. How can we, as a society, stand by and watch our sons kill and be killed? It all must stop now. Society needs to step up and take responsibility for creating these violent young men or nothing will change. But how can we end the violence? If it was as easy as just saying it, there would not be any problem to deal with. Who should be held responsible for turning our innocent babies into ruthless killers? Most people do not want to believe that they are to blame for the violence. There is not just one group who is responsible. Many people are responsible. Whether it is by forcing these violent tendencies on to young men, or simply by turning the other way and not trying to find a solution to the problem. Many people believe that some children are just born bad. This, of course, is a myth. Kids are not naturally bad. Violence is a learned behavior (APA Public). The children have to pick it up from somewhere. But where? Many of these kids pick it up in the home, media, or community that they live in. There are a variety of contributing factors that lead these young men down that violent path. Many of these children feel overwhelmed by peer pressure, low self-esteem, or a need for attention or respect (APA Help). Also many have easy access to guns or other weapons. Numerous boys have been abused and/or have been witnesses to violence (APA Help). There are a number of reasons that young men turn to violence. Some of those are; as a type of expression, manipulation, retaliation, or because it is all that they know. Many boys today, are lacking a positive male role model in the home. Without that father figure in their lives to teach them the right way to become a man, it can be hard to find that right path. The likelihood that a young male will engage in criminal activity doubles if he is raised without a father and triples if he lives in a neighborhood with a high concentration of single-parent families (Horn). Studies have shown that 72% of adolescents charged with murder grew up without their fathers (Horn). Forensic psychologist, Shawn Johnston stated, The research is absolutely clearthe one human being most capable of curbing the antisocial aggression of a boy is his biological father (Horn). Violence on television, in movies, and in music is also corrupting our youth. Three well-known studies all found that heavy exposure to televised violence is one of the significant causes of violence in society (APA Public). Televised violence has shown to cause people to be less trusting and more self-protective, along with desensitizing the person to violence. This type of violence is also known to potentially make the viewer want to become involved with some kind of violent act. Violence in television shows the viewer that through violence wanted items may be obtained. Sexual violence in t.v. has been proven to make young men more aggressive toward females. All of these effects are short as well as long term (APA Public). Young people should not be so exposed to violence, especially young men, when it is known that witnessing violence leads to committing it. Many boys are not only witnessing violence on a screen, many are seeing it live. The communities that these young men live in are also partially at fault for this violence. In many inner-city communities there are two main routes these youths can take; be pushed around all the time, or stand up and fight. In some areas of the country, it is now more likely for a black male between 15 and 25 to die from homicide than it was for a United States soldier to be killed on a tour of duty in Vietnam (APA Public). Many of the same boys who are lacking a father figure in the home find someone in the community to teach them about being a man.